akis diams 7 months ago

I must add Mr. De Haan, that after your total fail I asked a second opinion from another Advocat and they indeed declared that by significant professional errors you failed to defence me thus I gave the case to another Advocat. But you already had done the job and court had nno trust anymore in my case. An Advocat who admits that his client knew about the wrong roof constuction must never accept to defent a client if you don't not believe in his innocent. But you just do not care. For money you are able to destroy anybody. Indeed, the initial claim from the other Party was 12.000 euros and after 4 years, thanks to you, uncapable and unprofessional Advocat you are, I had to pay a total of 25.000 euros for this case. I didn't know anything about the wrong construction of the roof, as you declare stupidly here, but you manage all in manner that the whole process goes wrong and against me although it was an easy case to win having the good evidences which unfortunately and incontiently. you never used, You were, even , sitting during sittings in the court watching them without even interrogating people in my favor. You are a good for nothing and normally you owe to me to reimburse me this this money. I advice everybody to stay far from such a Advocate if you do not want to lose all your property or lose your case.
lees meer..

Akis Diams 5 years ago

Unusefull try to justify yourself. I am not interested what collaborators or clients write "good things" for this Avocaten Kantoor. Everybody has his own case and has used different avocats. But my own experience has to do with Mr. De Haan. What ever mr. De Haan says here below is only a try to justify himself but he knows very well that he treated my case in complete desinterest and without studying it in deep.. I had to write him pages of tips and evidenties to follow because he never studied them (I have his written proof for whom needs evidence on this fact). Was eveb shocking the fact as he told me once that he didn;t say to the court what I had asked him to say because, he told me, he didn;t want to ridiculise himself!!!. Incedible arrogance! I have even used and paid 2 other advocats to study the case and give me a second opinion about the way Mr. De Haan treatted and defended me. Both were negative and affirmative that mr De Haan's way of acting was not the good one, not efficient and noot successful. He could had made it much better. He didn;t even interfear in interviewing the other testimonies in the correct moments. He missed lot opportunities to defend me correctly and did lot of errors during his "defending". Only the fact that he proposed, nota bene, to offer as presence my own testimony (the worker of my roof) to the other party it was a really fatal error and decisive for the failure of the case. An irreversible failure of the case, Thus I changed Advocat but because the initial way of treating the case was wrong, the second advocat he could do nothing successful anymore. He would had liked, he tolf me, to ask lot of things to the testimonies but this, at that moment, was not any more possible. It was to late to do so for thse sittings, It should be done during the sittings of Mr. De Haan who missed in doing it.. Mr. De Haan did already big mistakes and a fatal case out of my case and this blocked other Avocats in defending me correctly anymore. Judge was already infulenced negatively. I lost the case with no one possitive point and the price to pay was very high. Finally I must say, Mr. De Haan knew from the beginning that I was not aware of the state of the roof that is why he gave me a 80% for winning the case. In other words, he has been an uncapable avocat for my case and this is proven be other of his collegues, whom I hired to get a second opinion. I do not reccomend him, At least for my case he took it very easy and didn't give the correct importance and weight.
lees meer..

C Adnour 8 months ago

Hele goede ervaringen met dhr Appelman gehad. Hij heeft mij enkele jaren bijgestaan op verschillende gebieden, vooral wat betreft echtscheiding en omgang, en ben daar zeer tevreden over. Hij geeft eerlijk en realistisch advies, reageert snel op vragen en heeft genoeg kennis van eerder genoemde zaken. Je bent bij hem geen dossiernummer maar een mens. Ik hoop hem in de toekomst niet meer nodig te hebben maar zal anders zeker weer bij hem aankloppen.
lees meer..

Melissa Van Roode 9 months ago

Hele goede ervaring goed contact snel reacties terug mail,telefonisch goed bereikbaar Meerdere zaken gewonnen dankzei mnr appelman Raad mnr Appelman aan iedereen aan

Ghislaine Desserjer 9 months ago

Zeer kundig geholpen door dhr. Appelman. Reageert erg vlot op e-mails waardoor alles soepel is verlopen.